Susan C. Rempel, Ph.D.

May 152013
 
Constitutional Post Pass

We tend to think of Ben Franklin as the creator of the US Postal System, but there is an unsung patriot who should be remembered as the creator of the Constitutional Post. 

Although he was not the founder of the colonial postal system per se, Benjamin Franklin dramatically improved the manner in which mail was delivered during his time as postmaster general for the Crown. Delivery routes had been changed to improve efficiency. Post riders moved mail between New York and Philadelphia at night. The postal service actually operated at a profit under Franklin’s direction in 1760. The British relieved Franklin of his duties in 1774 after he revealed the Governor of Massachusetts, Thomas Hutchinson’s, willingness to impose further regulations and taxes on Colonists. When Franklin left the Crown’s postal service, the mail moved smoothly, via a number of routes, from Florida in the south to Canada in the north. It also moved between the Colonies and Britain at regular intervals. 

The postal service prior to the Revolution was known as the Crown Post. In 1775, the conflict between Britain and the Colonies was mounting. The British took steps to block communication between committees of correspondence and others who might be sympathetic to the independence movement. Newspapers were destroyed. Private correspondence was opened and read. The transfer of information was disrupted in order to prevent it from being redistributed to Colonists via pamphlet s or newspapers. 

One newspaper which was often disrupted was William Goddard’s Pennsylvania Chronicle. Goddard’s father, Giles Goddard, served as the postmaster of New London during Benjamin Franklin’s time of service at the Crown Post. Goddard’s sister, Mary, was also a printer. She published the first certified copy of the Declaration of Independence in January, 1777. Needless to say many of Goddard’s family members were well known as printers. Goddard, himself, had worked with Franklin as a printer, and that definitely made him a person of interest in the eyes of British officials. The delivery of the Pennsylvania Chronicle was often interrupted. Goddard sometimes employed private carriers to disseminate it. Increased taxation on newspaper delivery finally forced the Pennsylvania Chronicle out of business in 1773. 

In March 1774, The Boston Committee of Correspondence suggested to the Salem Committee of Correspondence that William Goddard should be placed in charge of constructing a system by which mail could be transported outside of the purview of British officials and loyalists. In October, 1774, Goddard proposed a plan to implement a postal service to the Continental Congress. By the time that Congress adopted the plan in July, 1775, the Constitutional Post was in business and had 30 post offices. This service, funded by subscription from participating Colonists, fostered the transfer of information and communication between New York and Philadelphia. Revenues from the system were used to further improve it. When Congress formally established a postal service, they chose to name Benjamin Franklin as the first Postmaster General. Goddard reluctantly accepted the position of Riding Surveyor. The attached image is a pass which Franklin created for Goddard on September 4, 1776. The pass explained his position with the post office which had been established by Congress. It also permitted him to travel throughout the Colonies. 

The Constitutional Post was so successful, and the Colonists were so distrustful of the Crown Post, that the Crown Post discontinued operation on December 25, 1775. The central location for Constitutional Post was at the London Coffee House which was a focal point in Philadelphia. 

When Benjamin Franklin resigned from the position as Postmaster General, Congress chose to appoint Franklin’s son-in-law, Richard Bache, rather than Goddard to the post. Goddard resigned and eventually took over the Maryland Journal which had been run exclusively by his sister, Mary, since the time he moved to Philadelphia. However, Goddard should be remembered as the innovative patriot who productively responded to the Crown’s tyranny and instituted the framework for our postal system. 

Please take a moment to remember What IS Right With America!

Susan

Susan C. Rempel, Ph.D. 
www.bingoforpatriots.com

May 132013
 
Washington Marquee

If you have a bit of extra time, visit the Museum of the American Revolution’s website. The Museum is currently under construction and expects to open in 2016. The museum and ColonialWilliamsburg are currently collaborating on a fascinating restoration project. They are replicating the field headquarters used by George Washington during the American Revolution! Although a building was constructed to house the General at Valley Forge, he also traveled with the Continental Army troops. He both slept and conducted the business of directing the army in a tent sometimes known as a marquee. The attached image is of a 1910 postcard which depicts the marquee used by Washington. 

Read about the project from the Museum’s website here:http://www.americanrevolutioncenter.org/?utm_source=First+Oval+Office+Initiative&utm_campaign=First+Oval+Office&utm_medium=socialshare 

A press release from the Colonial Williamsburg site is available here:http://www.americanrevolutioncenter.org/first-oval-office/first-oval-office-documenting-preserving-and-replicating-revolutionary-war-home

The Museum of the American Revolution will be home to such treasures as Patrick Henry’s Law Books, the copy of the Liberty Bell given to the US by Britain celebration of our Bicentennial in 1976, and the cups used by George Washington at Valley Forge. It is already a wonderful online resource that I have decided to support: You can also support the Museum of the American Revolution as well here: http://www.americanrevolutioncenter.org/make-gift

Take a moment to remember What IS Right With America!

Susan

Susan C. Rempel, Ph.D.

May 102013
 
Schuylkill River

A bit of levity for a Friday afternoon! I know that sometimes I make life difficult for my children. They have the “mom on a mission”/”wacky history lady” living in their midst. I find the Founding Fathers, Founding Documents, and Founding Principles so fascinating that I just have to share all the interesting things that I find with them. Consequently, my poor cherubs are constantly pelted with questions beginning with: “Did you know,” “Have you heard of,” or “Have you read?” Well, here’s a twist on what usually goes on around my house! Last night, we were finishing up dinner. My older daughter was describing an idea that she had for an invention. Somehow the conversation shifted and she asked me, “Mom, did you know that Ben Franklin invented flippers?” My first reaction was, “No. No. Ben Franklin invented an array of amazing things but surely not swim fins….” My daughter, who spent considerable time reading about Franklin in the fifth grade, assured me that she was correct. She hopped on her IPAD and quickly found a reference. Much to my amazement, Benjamin Franklin was an avid swimmer! 

It is common knowledge that Ben Franklin was an inventor who designed a number of items that continue to be in use today. Bifocal glasses, an odometer, and the lightening rod are amongst his most notable inventions. But swimming fins, really? Actually, they were more of swim paddles to wear on the hands. Franklin, himself, was not happy with the fins he designed for his feet. Franklin developed the swim paddles when he was eleven years old! In Franklin’s autobiography, produced by his grandson William Temple Franklin, in 1818, the following passage from Franklin was included: “When a youth, I made two oval pallets, each about ten inches long, and six broad, with a hole for the thumb, in order to retain it fast in the palm of my hand. They much resembled a painter’s pallets. In swimming I pushed the edges of these forward, and I struck the water with their flat surfaces as I drew them back. I remember I swam faster by means of these pallets, but they fatigued my wrists. I also fitted to the soles of my feet a kind of sandals, but I was not satisfied with them, because I observed that the stroke is partly given by the inside of the feet and the ankles, and not entirely with the soles of the feet.”

As Franklin continued to impart his thoughts about swimming as a healthful and relaxing activity, he related the following story from his childhood: “When I was a boy, I amused myself one day with flying a paper kite, and approaching the bank of a pond which was near a mile broad, I tied the string to a stake, and the kite ascended to a very considerable height above the pond while I was swimming. In a little time being desirous of amusing myself with my kite and enjoying at the same time the pleasure of swimming, I returned; and, loosing from the stake the string with the little stick which was fastened to it, went again into the water where I found that, lying on my back and holding the stick in my hands, I was drawn along the surface of the water in a very agreeable manner. Having then engaged another boy to carry my clothes round the pond, to a place which I pointed out to him on the other side, I began to cross the pond with my kite, which carried me quite over without the least fatigue, and with the greatest pleasure imaginable. I was only obliged occasionally to halt a little in my course, and resist its progress, when it appeared that by following too quick, I lowered the kite too much; by doing which I occasionally made it rise again.”
In my mind, that story transformed Benjamin Franklin from a lofty Founding Figure to a human being who had a host of childhood memories just like the rest of us. It brings a smile to my face to think of little Ben Franklin figuring out that his kite could pull him across the pond using the force of the wind? I am not sure which of the ponds in Massachusetts that Franklin referenced, but he was known to swim in the Schuylkill River in Pennsylvania which is featured in this image.

Franklin was so enthusiastic about swimming that he once swam more than three miles in the Thames River, as well as encouraging other adults to learn how to swim. He also advised that children be taught to swim: “’’Tis supposed that every parent would be glad to have their children skilled in swimming, if it might be learnt in a place chosen for its safety and under the eye of a careful person . . .’tis some advantage besides, to be free from the slavish terrors many of those feel who cannot swim, when they are obliged to be on the water even in crossing a ferry.” Benjamin Franklin was inducted into the Swimming Hall of Fame in 1968.

My daughter maintains her contention that Franklin also invented a pair of fins for his feet that he found to be useful. I could not find verification of such. If you have any information, please feel free to enlighten me!

Please take a moment to reflect on the amazing inventions made by our fellow countrymen, and What IS Right With America!

Susan

Susan C. Rempel, Ph.D.

May 082013
 
George Washington Inauguration

I have been researching this post for several days. I have so much primary source information that I’ve decided to create an ebook that includes a study guide to help you learn about the topic in greater depth, as well as teaching the material to your children. It will contain eye witness accounts, diary entries, letters, news and magazine posts, additional thoughts Washington chose not to include in first inaugural address, as well as lengthier material from quotes included below.….Stay tuned!

With good reason, George Washington is often viewed in larger than life terms. Yet, as you will see, he was very much a human being. April 30th marked the anniversary of his first inauguration. The year was 1789, and the place was Federal Hall in New York City. The Revolution had been won. The Constitution written and ratified. The election held, and the Electoral College votes counted. George Washington had been unanimously elected, with 69 votes, as the first President of the United States. A vote of confidence not given to any other leader of the Executive Branch by the People since that time. 

Washington had only been officially notified of his election 16 days prior to the inauguration ceremony. The Congress of Confederation had called for the President to be sworn in on March 4, 1789. However, bad weather had prevented the House of Representatives from achieving a quorum until April 1. The Senate was not able to achieve a quorum until April 6, but after which a joint session was immediately held to count the electoral votes. On that same day, congratulatory letters streamed toward Mount Vernon from notables such as James Madison, Richard Henry Lee, and Robert Morris. On April 14, Washington received an letter from the President Pro Tempore of the Senate, John Langdon from New Hampshire, announcing the outcome of the Electoral College ballots. 

Was George Washington elated about the election outcome? Did he arrogantly assume he was the only man for the job? Was he anticipating that a reception fit for a king would be made ready for him in New York? Quite the contrary! Two days later, when George Washington left for New York, his journal entry reflected his obvious anxiety about becoming the first President: “About 10 o’clock I bade adieu to Mount Vernon, to private life, and to domestic felicity, and with a mind oppressed with more anxious and painful sensations than I have words to express, set out for New York in company with Mr. Thompson, and Colonel Humphries, with the best dispositions to render service to my country in obedience to its call, but with less hope of answering its expectations.” Between the time that he was officially notified of his election, and day he was sworn into office, Washington wrote a series of letters articulating his apprehension about serving as the new nation’s commander-in-chief. One such example is a letter written to the President and Faculty of the University of Pennsylvania that included the following: “Probably my fellow-citizens anticipate too many and too great advantages from the appointment—It will however be an object, indeed near to my heart, to verify as far as may be in my power, those favorable presentiments, by endeavoring to secure the liberty and promote the happiness of the american People”.

While George Washington had reservations about becoming President, and returning to public service, they were not shared by others. By all accounts, the man who most Americans desired as their first President was George Washington. He had led them to independence as Commander-in-Chief of the Continental Army, and then he had done much to hold the thirteen states together in years immediately following General Cornwallis’ surrender at Yorktown. As an example of the People’s confidence in Washington, James Madison wrote to Edmund Randolph on May 10, 1789: “No question has been made in this quarter or elsewhere as far as I have learned, whether the Genl ought to have accepted the Trust. On the contrary opinions have been unanimous & decided that it was essential to the commencement of the Government and a duty from which no private considerations could absolve him.”

Despite his trepidations, George Washington accepted the election results and set off for New York. Given his reservations, I have to wonder if he was taken aback by the reception he received enroute. Indeed, he may have been overwhelmed by the pomp and circumstance surrounding the first inauguration that awaited him in New York. A ceremonial procession brought George Washington from Mount Vernon to New York City. Members of Congress, government officials, Continental Army officers and enlisted men, prominent citizens, and even members of local militias traveled with Washington at various points of the journey. He traveled through the towns of Alexandria, Georgetown, Baltimore, Philadelphia, and Trenton. As he passed through various cities, accounts were published about the procession, and letters of thanks from Washington to the citizens were published as well. When he reached Elizabeth Town, New Jersey on April 23, he boarded a barge which would take him to New York. However, the barge did not deliver Washington directly to a procession that would lead him to Federal Hall. Washington’s inauguration had been further delayed as the House and Senate haggled over the details of the inauguration ceremony. During that period, Washington wrote numerous letters as he waited in his residence on Cherry Street in New York. 

Washington was finally taken to Federal Hall on April 30. Using a Bible hastily borrowed from the St. John’s Masonic Lodge Number 1, Robert R. Livingston swore him in as president. The Supreme Court had not yet assembled, and Chancellor Livingston was the highest judicial officer available to administer the oath of office. After Washington was sworn into office on the balcony, as portrayed in the attached image, Livingston proclaimed, “Long live George Washington President of the United States.” The crowded, if not chaotic, scene below the balcony was documented in magazines and newspaper posts. 
Washington then returned to the Senate Chamber where he would deliver his first inaugural address. Before reading on, think about the images you have seen portraying George Washington as a military commander. Perhaps the most famous two are of him crossing the Delaware (as can be seen on: http://www.bingoforpatriots.com/american-history/american-revolution/military-actions-of-the-revolution/eyewitness-account-of-washington-crossing-the-delaware/) or on a winter’s day at Valley Forge (as can be seen on http://www.bingoforpatriots.com/american-history/american-revolution/military-actions-of-the-revolution/valley-forge/). These pictures portray him as a strong and confident military leader. On April 30, 1789, however, George Washington assumed a much different role. By all accounts he was reluctant about leading the nation. 

He began his first inaugural address with the following words: “AMONG the vicissitudes incident to life no event could have filled me with greater anxieties than that of which the notification was transmitted by your order, and received on the 14th day of the present month. On the one hand, I was summoned by my country, whose voice I can never hear but with veneration and love, from a retreat which I had chosen with the fondest predilection, and, in my flattering hopes, with an immutable decision, as the asylum of my declining years….All I dare hope is that if, in executing this task, I have been too much swayed by a grateful remembrance of former instances, or by an affectionate sensibility to this transcendent proof of the confidence of my fellow-citizens, and have thence too little consulted my incapacity as well as disinclination for the weighty and untried cares before me, my error will be palliated by the motives which mislead me, and its consequences be judged by my country with some share of the partiality in which they originated.” As Washington read those words, he was clearly uneasy. In his journal, Senator William Maclay, provided a lengthy eye witness account of Washington’s demeanor. Perhaps the most poignant description found the new president to be: “agitated and embarassed more than ever he was by the levelled cannon or pointed musket. He trembled and several times could scarce make out, to read, though it must be supposed he had often read it before.”

It is clear that the enormity of the moment had overtaken Washington, but he could hardly be blamed for such an emotional response. He had settled into retirement only to be thrust into a role for which he felt he had little preparation. Additionally, little guidance had been given concerning how President Washington should conduct himself, or the Executive Branch, on a day-to-day basis. It gives me pause to think of George Washington as a man who reluctantly assumed the presidency. Despite his extraordinary abilities, he was clearly a man of great humanity and humility as well.

Read the complete text of George Washington’s First Inaugural Address here: http://www.bingoforpatriots.com/american-history/founding-fathers/presidents-during-the-founding-period/george-washington/george-washingtons-first-inaugural-address/

I’ll let you know when that ebook is ready to go!

As always, please take a moment to remember What IS Right With America!

Susan

Susan C. Rempel, Ph.D.

May 072013
 
Essex Result

A set of resolutions was approved by a committee of representatives from 12 towns in northeastern Massachusetts on April 29, 1778. Although the resolutions pertained to the proposed constitution which had been created by the Massachusetts Legislature, the document reflected many of the principles the Founders relied upon while constructing the United States Constitution and the Bill of Rights. The resulting pamphlet created for distribution is known as the Essex Result. 

The Massachusetts legislature had met, proposed a constitution, and asked the electorate to vote on the document. Ultimately, that constitution was rejected because it was not created by a group that was separate from the legislature. It also lacked a declaration of rights, a true separation of powers, and explicitly condoned slavery.

The resolutions, and resulting pamphlet that form the Essex Result, were primarily constructed by Theophilus Parsons, a 27 year old lawyer from Newburyport Massachusetts. Parsons eventually served as Chief Justice of the Massachusetts Supreme Court. Although you may have never heard of the Essex Result, it includes a succinct discussion of the theoretical underpinnings of the Constitution (e.g., natural rights, social contract, consent of the governed, etc.), as well as an outline for a three branch system of government complete with a system of checks and balances. It is well worth your time to read the pamphlet because of the concise discussion of many of our Founding First Principles. 

What I found particularly interesting was the speculation of what might happen if the three branches of government were became unbalanced or merged together: 

“If the three powers are united, the government will be absolute, whether these powers are in the hands of one or a large number. The same party will be the legislator, accuser, judge and executioner; and what probability will an accused person have of an acquittal, however innocent he may be, when his judge will be also a party….If the legislative and judicial powers are united, the maker of the law will also interpret it; and the law may then speak a language, dictated by the whims, the caprice, or the prejudice of the judge, with impunity to him…. Should the executive and legislative powers be united, mischiefs the most terrible would follow. The executive would enact those laws it pleased to execute, and no others–The judicial power would be set aside as inconvenient and tardy–The security and protection of the subject would be a shadow–The executive power would make itself absolute, and the government end in a tyranny… Should the executive and judicial powers be united, the subject would then have no permanent security of his person and property. The executive power would interpret the laws and bend them to his will; and, as he is the judge, he may leap over them by artful constructions, and gratify, with impunity, the most rapacious passions.”

The Essex Result should remind us of the wisdom of those who founded our great nation. The concerns raised in the Essex Result are almost prophetic. The remedy, of course, is to restore our system to its original state of balance. 

Read the Essex Result at:http://www.bingoforpatriots.com/american-history/founding-documents-federal-and-state/constitution-of-the-united-states-of-america/documents-which-influenced-the-constitution/essex-result/

Please take a moment to consider the wisdom of our Founders, the First Principle of “the consent of the governed,” and What IS Right With America.

Susan

Susan C. Rempel, Ph.D.

May 032013
 
bison

In addition to our National Parks, our country is filled with other treasures. Amongst them are our National Game Preserves. Theodore Roosevelt created 55 different areas strictly intendedto preserve our nation’s wildlife. April 27 marks the 109th anniversary of Sullys Hill, becoming a National Game Preserve. Named after General Alfred Sully, a West Point Graduate and Brevet Brigadier General of the United States Army, Sullys Hill can be found in the glacial moraine hills of North Dakota along the shore of Devil’s Lake. It contains a combination of prairie, woodland, and lake ecosystems. The preserve is more than 1500 acres and is filled with Prairie Dogs, white-tailed deer, and American Bison. A bison is featured in the attached image. Six bison were reintroduced into the area in 1918 from the Portland, Oregon Zoo. Elk were transferred from Yellowstone National Park. Sully Hills is one of a handful of havens specifically intended to be the home of elk and bison. Prairie dogs were reintroduced in 1975. I remember my then third grade son learned about the Prairie Dog “towns” in North Dakota. They formed a complex borough system and worked together to avoid common threats. More than 250 different species of birds that normally found on the prairie can be observed in Sullys Hill. Although not reintroduced to the area, Sullys Hill is also home to beavers, woodchucks, rabbits, muskrats, squirrels, minks, weasels, skunks, raccoons, and foxes. 

Visitors can observe the wildlife and ecosystems in the preserve by driving along a four mile route or hiking along Sweetwater Lake. Sullys Hill has visitor center which offers a variety of educational opportunities for both adults and children. 

Sullys Hill is currently maintained by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. The website for Sullys Hill is:http://www.fws.gov/sullyshill/

May 022013
 
Williamsburg_magazine_drawing_exterior

The American Revolution began in Lexington on April 19, 1775, and the Lexington Alarm spread the news throughout the Northern Colonies. The second stop for the troops which marched on Lexington was in Concord. It was there that they hoped to raid Colonial arms and ammunition stockpiles. The stockpiles had been moved, and the troops found little that was of interest in their door-to-door search of the town.

The news of the Battle of Lexington had not reached Virginia by April 20th. However, an incident in that Colony took place on that day which propelled it toward joining the effort to win independence from Britain. After Patrick Henry’s fiery speech before the Second Virginia Convention on March 23rd, the Royal Governor, Lord Dunmore, decided it was time to assure control of the Colony. In what is often referred to as “The Gunpowder Incident,” the Royal Governor of Virginia gave an order that would limit the Colonists’ access to gun power. The order was for British troops to remove the powder that was stored in Williamsburg and secret it away from the town. 

Of course, there were no longer troops stationed in Virginia who could remove the powder. They had all been recalled to Massachusetts after the Powder Alarm in September, 1774. Chesapeake Bay was, however, home to several ships of the Royal Navy. The HMS Magdalen, captained by Henry Collins, was one of those ships. It was Captain Collins who received the order from Lord Dunmore to remove the gunpowder from Williamsburg. The attached image is a drawing of the powder house in Williamsburg.

Collins, and his troops, attempted to remove the gunpowder under the cloak of darkness. They successfully removed more than 15 barrels of powder until a local citizen took note of their actions and sounded the alarm. The system of express riders and militia sprang into action. They were prepared to storm Lord Dunmore’s residence until being dissuaded by notable residents such as Peyton Randolph. 

Although the Colonial response to the incident had been postponed, the Common Council of the City of Williamsburg demanded return of the gun powder. The letter that was sent to Lord Dunmore read as follows: 

“My Lord,

We, his majesty’s dutiful and loyal subjects, the mayor; recorder, aldermen, and common council of the city of Williamsburg, in common hall assembled, humbly beg leave to represent to your excellency, that the inhabitants of this city, were this morning, exceedingly alarmed by a report that a large quantity of gunpowder was, in the preceding night, while they were sleeping in their beds, removed from the public magazine in this city, and conveyed, under an escort of marines, on board one of his majesty’s armed vessels lying at a ferry on James river.
We beg leave to represent to your excellency, that, as the magazine was erected at the public expense of this colony, and appropriated to the safe keeping of such munition as should be there lodged, from time to time, for the protection and security of the country, by arming thereout, such of the militia as might be necessary in cases of invasions and insurrections, they humbly conceive it to be the only proper repository to be resorted to in times of imminent danger.

We further beg leave to inform your excellency, that, from various reports at present prevailing in different parts of the country, we have too much reason to believe that some wicked and designing persons have instilled the most diabolical notions into the minds of our slaves; and that, therefore, the utmost attention to our internal security, is become the more necessary.
The circumstances of this city, my lord, we consider as peculiar and critical. The inhabitants, from the situation of the magazine in the midst of their city, have for a long tract of time, been exposed to all those dangers which have happened in many countries from explosions, and other accidents. They have, from time to time, thought it incumbent on them to guard the magazine. For their security they have, for some time past, judged it necessary to keep strong patrols on foot: in their present circumstances then, to have the chief and necessary means of their defence removed, cannot but be extremely alarming.

Considering ourselves as guardians of the city, we therefore humbly desire to be informed by your excellency, upon what motives, and for what particular purpose, the powder has been carried off in such a manner; and we earnestly entreat your excellency to order it to be immediately returned to the magazine.”

Lord Dunmore was unmoved by the Council’s arguments. He responded that the powder had been moved due to “an insurrection in a neighbouring county.” It had been moved at night to prevent alarming any of the inhabitants of Williamsburg. Dunmore claimed upon his word and honor that it could be returned within 30 minutes if necessary. He added that because the residents of Williamsburg had been prepared to take up arms in response to the powder’s relocation, it might not be a good idea for them to have access to the powder at all in the future.

The situation again escalated when troops from the Magdalen again landed on shore, and the local residents assumed the troops would completely empty the powder house. The townspeople were once again prepared to take up arms in order to prevent removal of more powder from the Williamsburg magazine. They were, however, again calmed by the assurances from notables amongst them. There was no one to calm Lord Dunmore, however. On April 22, he sent another message to one of the city’s magistrates that further threats would be responded to by burning the town and freeing all of the slaves. Although the good citizens did not violently respond to Lord Dunmore’s threats, more than 700 of them did take up arms and assemble in Fredericksburg when news of the Battle of Lexington reached them. Although assurances from Lord Dunmore did quell the Colonists for a brief period, he, and his family, fled from Williamsburg on June 8th. He began living on a ship in Chesapeake Bay but left Virginia once and for all in August, 1776. The Third Virginia Convention appointed members to a committee of safety which would operate a Colonial government in July, 1775. 

This was not the first time that representatives of the Crown sought to control the Colonists by limiting their access to gunpowder. However, incidents such as the Powder Alarm will be discussed in future posts. Suffice it to say, we have always been a people who resisted efforts to take away our arms. We have also always assured the ability to defend our liberty.

As always, please reflect on What IS Right With America!

Susan

Susan C. Rempel, Ph.D.

Apr 282013
 
lexington-alarm

A post discussing committees of safety will have to wait because I found something absolutely fascinating! April 19th marked the anniversary of the Battle of Lexington. The troops which Paul Revere and William Dawes had warned of arrived in Lexington. A standoff between the British troops and local militia took place, and in what is often referred to as “the shot heard round the world,” the American Revolution began. It was critical that notice of the battle reach key people and militia groups which had formed throughout the Colonies, but how would the news be spread? The answer was through communications between the committees of correspondence which I discussed in the previous post. 

The initial letter about the Battle of Lexington has become known as the “Lexington Alarm.” It was authored by a member of the Massachusetts Committee of Safety named Joseph Palmer. The letter ended with Palmer’s signature. The attached image is a copy created by the Committee of Correspondence of Worchester. By the time it reached Worchester, it had already been reviewed by 10 other committees of correspondence. 

The Lexington Alarm was carried more than 350 miles during a 5 day journey by one or more express riders. The route passed from Massachusetts through Connecticut, New York, New Jersey, and ended in Philadelphia. The Lexington Alarm may have been solely carried by a 23 year old East Windsor, Connecticut resident named Israel Bissell who was actually named in the document. His name may have been included in the original letter in order to increase its validity. Other copies refer to him as Isaac Bissell. Bissell rushed so quickly to carry the news that his horse died when he reached Worchester. 

Read for yourself the news that spread from Massachusetts about the Battle of Lexington: 

“PHILADELPHIA, April 24, 1775.

An express arrived at 5 o’clock this evening, by which we have the following advices, viz.

WATERTOWN, Wednesday morning, near 10 o’clock

To all FRIENDS of AMERICAN LIBERTY,

Be it known, that this morning, before break of day, a brigade, consisting of about 1000 or 1200 men, landed at Phipps farm, at Cambridge, and marched to Lexington, where they found a company of our colony militia in arms, upon whom they fired, without any provocation, and killed six men, and wounded four others. By an express from Boston, we find another brigade is now on its march from Boston supposed to be about 1,000. The Bearer, Israel Bissell, is charged to alarm the country, quite to Connecticut; and all persons are desired¬¬ to furnish him with fresh horses, as they may be needed. I have spoken with several, who have seen the dead and wounded. Pray let the Delegates from this colony to Connecticut see this; they know Col. Foster, one of the Delegates.

J. Palmer, one of the committee of safety

A true copy from the original, by order of the committee of correspondence of Worchester, April 1775. 

Attended and forwarded by the committees of Brookline, Norwich, New London, Lyme, Saybrook, Killingsworth, E. Guilford, Fuilford, Brandford, Newhaven.” 

What happened next? The letter was copied, commented upon, and endorsed by the members of the other committees of correspondence who reviewed it. The following is another copy of the Lexington Alarm as copied by Eb. Williams. It also bore a reference to Colonel Obadiah Johnson. Both of whom appear to reside in Canturbury. Note the similarity to the above listed document, but this letter ends with information about what occurred while the British troops were in Concord: 

“PHILADELPHIA, April 24, 1775.

A express arrived at 5 o’clock this evening, by which we have the following advices. 

Watertown, Wednesday Morning, near 10 o’clock

To all FRIENDS of AMERICAN LIBERTY.

Be it known that this morning before break of day a brigade consisting of about 1000 to 1200 men landed at Phipp’s Farm and Cambridge and marched to Lexington, where they found a company of our Colony militia in arms, upon whom they fired without any provocation, and killed six men and wounded four others. 

The regulars, when in Concord, burned the Court House, took two pieces of cannon, which they rendered useless, and began to take up Concord bridge, on which Capt. Davis (who, with many on both sides, were soon killed), made an attack on the King’s troops, on which they retreated to Lexington.” 

I found another reference to Williams’ copy which had an additional paragraph. “I am this moment informed by express from Woodstock taken from the mouth of the express that arrived there 2 of the clock afternoon, that the contest between the first brigade that marched to Concord was still continuing this morning at the town of Lexington to which said brigade had retreated. That another brigade said to be the second mentioned in the letter of this morning had landed with a quantity of artillery at the place where they first did. Provincials were determined to prevent the two brigades from joining their strength if possible and remain in great need of Succour.” No doubt the additional paragraph was added to different copy of Williams’ letter from the one which I reviewed.

Other endorsements and copies of the Lexington Alarm include instructions to gather troops and comments regarding conditions of the roads or crossings. It is clear that the rider(s) traveled with little or no rest. The copy endorsed by the committee in Saybrook was done so at 4:00 a.m.. It is unknown how many people were notified directly or indirectly about the events on April 19th via the Lexington Alarm, but the news spread like wildfire. In Connecticut alone, more than 3600 men from 48 different towns responded to the call to action in the letter.

The Lexington Alarm reached Philadelphia on April 24, 1775 at 5:00 p.m. More than 8000 Philadelphians heard the news from Lexington after being summoned by the state house bell. The final endorsement of the letter ended with “Account of the battle of Lexington sent by express from town to town. This is the paper sent to Philadelphia and delivered to me by one of the committee. Eben Hazard.” The Lexington Alarm was the rallying cry that led thousands of men to take up arms and move toward Boston. The Second Continental Congress met in May, 1775. At that time, they appointed George Washington as the commander of the Continental Army. 

The Massachusetts Provincial Congress later reimbursed Israel Bissell two pounds one shilling for his service in spreading the Lexington Alarm. While it is unclear if he was the only rider who carried this history changing news, he appears to be the only rider who received payment for his work. 

Please take a moment to reflect upon What IS Right With America!

Susan

Susan C. Rempel, Ph.D.

Apr 252013
 
Paul Revere Lantern

On April 18, 1775, Paul Revere and William Dawes set out on their famous midnight rides to prevent Samuel Adams and John Hancock from being captured. They also alerted local militias of the approach of British troops so as to protect Colonial arms and supplies that were stored in Concord. That much is fairly common knowledge, but did you ever wonder why Paul Revere came to be chosen to make that famous ride? 

Not only was Paul Revere a silversmith, an engraver, and a dentist (stay tuned for more about that), but he was also an express rider for the Boston Committee of Correspondence and the Massachusetts Committee for Safety. He would sometimes ride as far as Philadelphia or New York to deliver messages, information, or copies of resolutions. The news that British troops would soon move toward Lexington was certainly a valuable piece of information. So much so that, in anticipation of troop movement, Revere made arrangements for the now legendary signals in the Old North Church several days before the march began. Those signals, by the way, were not intended for Revere as Longfellow contended in his famous poem “The Midnight Ride of Paul Revere”. They actually served as a backup signal for patriots who lived in Charlestown in the event that Revere was unable to ride out of Boston himself. The attached images is of one of those lanterns which is now on display at the Museum of Concord.
What is a committee of correspondence? Committees of correspondence were groups of colonists who initially came together to address or resolve a specific issue. For example, a committee was organized in the province of Massachusetts Bay to urge other colonies to send representatives to the Stamp Act Congress. After the Congress convened, that particular committee of correspondence was disbanded. 

As the British Parliament continued to impose increasingly restrictive regulations and hefty taxes on the Colonies, ongoing committees of correspondence were established to communicate with one another and plan a coordinated response. The first such committee of correspondence was established in 1772 by Samuel Adams and Joseph Warren in Massachusetts. On March 12, 1773, an ongoing committee of correspondence was established in Virginia with the specific purpose of obtaining “the most early and authentic intelligence of all such Acts and resolutions of the British Parliament, or proceedings of administration, as may relate to or affect the British colonies in America, and to keep up and maintain a correspondence and communication with our sister colonies, respecting these important considerations.” Pennsylvania was the last colony to establish a committee of correspondence. It did so in May, 1774. 

As time passed, the network of committees of correspondence continued to grow throughout the Colonies. local committees were established in small towns and large cities. These groups served as an excellent vehicle of communication with other committees, as well as individuals who lived in rural areas. Membership in committees of correspondence at the township and local level swelled to more than 7000 men at one point. Massachusetts had more than 100 committees of correspondence within the colony itself. Many of the founding members of committees of correspondence which represented an entire colony read like a who’s who list of the men who signed their names on the Declaration of Independence. 

Members were often added to a committee after being nominated by current members. The process occurred because loyalists and representatives of the Crown would, no doubt, have disrupted any type of open election. As time progressed, committees began to behave much like unofficial governments. As boycotts were organized, committees monitored merchants and publicly decried those who continued to import products from Britain. They also coordinated efforts and actions with committees of safety. Eventually, provincial conventions were formed. After that transition, members were elected rather than nominated. 
Committees of correspondence and committees of safety were ultimately responsible for moving the Colonies toward seeking independence from Britain. For example, the Maryland Committee of Correspondence initiated plans that led to the First Continental Congress. A committee of correspondence was eventually created by the Continental Congresses, itself, to communicate with other governments. Many interesting documents were produced by the committee of correspondence for the various colonies. They will undoubtedly be the subject of future posts.

How did a committee of correspondence impact the events of April 18, 1775? Dr. Joseph Warren obtained information that British troops would begin a march to Lexington with plans to arrest John Hancock and Samuel Adams sometime before dawn. They would then continue on to Concord in search of the Colonial stockpile. Dr. Warren, a member of the Boston Committee of Correspondence, prompted the committee to dispatch Revere and William Dawes to warn of the pending troop movement. 

In one final bit of trivia, Joseph Warren was later killed in the Battle of Bunkerhill. Although his body was initially placed in a mass grave by the British, it was later exhumed, identified, and placed in an individual grave. How was it identified? By a prosthetic created by Paul Revere, in his role as dentist, to replace Dr. Warren’s first premolar and upper left canine. The prosthetic was identified by Revere himself. 

Tomorrow, I will write about committees of safety and the first intelligence network created by Colonists. 

Read the Virginia Resolution Establishing a Committee of Correspondence at: http://www.bingoforpatriots.com/american-history/13-colonies/committees-of-correspondence/virginia-resolutions-establishing-a-committee-of-correspondence/

Read the famous poem, “The Midnight Ride of Paul Revere”, at:http://www.bingoforpatriots.com/american-history/founding-fathers/other-notable-founding-figures/paul-revere-2/paul-reveres-ride/

As always, please take a moment to reflect on What IS Right With America!

Susan

Susan C. Rempel, Ph.D.

Apr 172013
 
Join or Die

What IS Right With America? The Continued Timeliness of Our Founding Fathers’ Contributions

A great man left us on April 17, 1790. It was on that day Benjamin Franklin died. Franklin is, perhaps, the Founding Father with the greatest diversity of talents and achievements. When he died, he was quite wealthy, and it is interesting to review his last will in testament. There is a link to his will on my website at the end of this post. Rather than recounting all his contributions and achievements, I spent time today updating an article I wrote last summer. It is based upon Franklin’s publication: Rules by Which a Great Empire May Be Reduced to a Small One. When I first read this publication, I was struck how it could have referenced our present day circumstances. I could not help adding a few of my own comments to Franklin’s wise words which are decidedly consistent with my conservative ideology. My comments are italicized and bracketed. I hope you enjoy it!

Benjamin Franklin’s Wise Words For Certain Elected Officials

While many suggest that there is nothing to be gained from reading the writings of the Founders, I completely disagree. Nothing helps us understand the context in which our nation was born more than the letters, pamphlets, and other writings produced during the time immediately surrounding the founding of our country. It is in those writings that the struggle between the Colonists and the King is evident, the reader can feel the mounting anger on both sides, and understand why the Founders sought to construct a nation with a limited federal government. 

While creating the information section about Benjamin Franklin for my website, www.bingoforpatriots.com, I came across Franklin’s satirical piece: Rules by Which a Great Empire May Be Reduced to a Small One. Franklin published this “suggestion list” in a journal entitled the Public Advertiser in 1773. Much like the attached political cartoon which is attributed to him, Franklin’s seething rage toward the King absolutely oozes off the paper of this step-by-step guide to alienating the colonists.

What can be learned from Dr. Franklin’s thoughts? How are they applicable today? If I may employ a bit of humor, please allow me the privilege of making a few suggestions as to how this list might be brought up-to-date. First, let me state that a portion of Dr. Franklin’s remarks make reference to the violence and atrocities inflicted on the Colonists by King George III. I am in no way suggesting that this is the case today, and I wish no harm come to anyone. However, several of Dr. Franklin’s suggestions can easily be extrapolated to events which have occurred over the past few years. In an effort to not repeat the past mistakes of others, I believe that certain elected officials might benefit from a review of Dr. Franklin’s wise words. My additions to the original work are bracketed, italicized, and blue in color:  

“I address myself to all Ministers who have the Management of extensive Dominions, which from their very Greatness are become troublesome to govern, because the Multiplicity of their Affairs leaves no Time for fiddling.

  1. In the first Place, Gentlemen, you are to consider, that a great Empire, like a great Cake, is most easily diminished at the Edges. Turn your Attention therefore first to your remotest Provinces [the citizens who are least likely to cast a vote for you in future elections]; that as you get rid of them [alienate them, anger them, etc.], the next may follow in Order.
  2. That the Possibility of this Separation may always exist, take special Care the Provinces [voters] are never incorporated with the Mother Country [or feel that their interests are in opposition to your vision for transforming our country], that they do not enjoy the same common Rights [as other citizens because you have promoted class warfare], the same Privileges in Commerce [if they own small businesses], and that they are governed by severer Laws [because of new mandates and regulations], all of your enacting, without allowing them any Share in the Choice of the Legislators [or unconfirmed appointees who are a part of the rapid expansion of the federal government]. By carefully making and preserving such Distinctions, you will (to keep to my Simile of the Cake) act like a wise Gingerbread Baker, who, to facilitate a Division, cuts his Dough half through in those Places, where, when bak’d, he would have it broken to Pieces.
  3. These remote Provinces [voters] have perhaps been acquired, purchas’d, or conquer’d [won over by the near mania that existed after the 2008 election], at the sole Expence of the Settlers [your opponents during the primaries] or their Ancestors [significant others and family members], without the Aid of the Mother Country (Democratic party). If this should happen to increase her Strength by their growing Numbers ready to join in her Wars, her Commerce by their growing Demand for her Manufactures, or her Naval Power by greater Employment for her Ships and Seamen, they may probably suppose some Merit in this, and that it entitles them to some Favour; you are therefore to forget it all, or resent it as if they had done you Injury [thus alienating people who are important in your efforts to be re-elected]. If they happen to be zealous Whigs, Friends of Liberty [Republicans or Tea Party activists], nurtur’d in Revolution Principles, remember all that to their Prejudice, and contrive to punish it: For such Principles, after a Revolution is thoroughly established, are of no more Use, they are even odious and abominable.
  4. However peaceably your Colonies [the states] have submitted to your Government, shewn their Affection to your Interest, and patiently borne their Grievances, you are to suppose them always inclined to revolt [or enact laws which challenge federal power and authority such as Arizona’s SB1070], and treat them accordingly. Quarter Troops among them, who by their Insolence may provoke the rising of Mobs, and by their Bullets and Bayonets suppress them. By this Means, like the Husband who uses his Wife ill from Suspicion, you may in Time convert your Suspicions into Realities.
  5. Remote Provinces must have Governors [local offices of federal agencies], and Judges, to represent the Royal Person, and execute every where the delegated Parts of his Office and Authority. You Ministers know, that much of the Strength of Government depends on the Opinion of the People; and much of that Opinion on the Choice of Rulers placed immediately over them. If you send them wise and good Men for Governors, who study the Interest of the Colonists [voters in each state], and advance their Prosperity, they will think their King wise and good, and that he wishes the Welfare of his Subjects. If you send them learned and upright Men for Judges, they will think him a Lover of Justice. This may attach your Provinces more to his Government. You are therefore to be careful who you recommend for those Offices. — If you can find Prodigals [donors to your campaigns or other supporters] who have ruined their Fortunes, broken Gamesters or Stock-Jobbers, these may do well as Governors (political appointments); for they will probably be rapacious, and provoke the People by their Extortions. Wrangling Proctors and petty-fogging Lawyers too are not amiss, for they will be for ever disputing and quarrelling with their little Parliaments [state legislatures and local elected bodies]. If withal they should be ignorant, wrong-headed and insolent, so much the better. Attorneys Clerks and Newgate Solicitors will do for Chief-Justices, especially if they hold their Places during your Pleasure: — And all will contribute to impress those ideas of your [transformation of the federal] Government that are proper for a People you would wish to renounce it.
  6. To confirm these Impressions, and strike them deeper, whenever the Injured come to the Capital with Complaints of Mal-administration, Oppression, or Injustice, punish such Suitors [who may be individual citizens, representatives of the states, or elected members of Congress] with long Delay, enormous Expence, and a final Judgment in Favour of the Oppressor. This will have an admirable Effect every Way. The Trouble of future Complaints will be prevented, and Governors and Judges will be encouraged to farther Acts of Oppression and Injustice; and thence the People may become more disaffected, and at length desperate.
  7. When such Governors [chiefs of staff and other political appointees] have crammed their Coffers [made unpopular statements, engaged in struggles within the administration, etc.], and made themselves so odious to the People that they can no longer remain among them with Safety to their Persons, recall and reward them with Pensions [we, citizens, tend to hear about financial or other vicarious benefits years after they have been arranged]. You may make them Baronets [ambassadors] too, if that respectable Order should not think fit to resent it. All will contribute to encourage new Governors in the same Practices, and make the supreme Government detestable.
  8. If when you are engaged in War, your Colonies [members of the armed forces] should vie in liberal Aids of Men and Money against the common Enemy, upon your simple Requisition, and give far beyond their Abilities, reflect, that a Penny taken from them by your Power is more honourable to you than a Pound presented by their Benevolence. Despise therefore their voluntary Grants [service to their country], and resolve to harrass them with novel Taxes [or advocate that the defense budget be slashed, future weapons development be placed on hold, and our nuclear stockpile be disarmed]. They will probably complain to your Parliaments [the Congress] that they are taxed by a Body in which they have no Representative [your administration], and that this is contrary to common Right. They will petition for Redress. Let the Parliaments flout their Claims, reject their Petitions, refuse even to suffer the reading of them, and treat the Petitioners with the utmost Contempt. Nothing can have a better Effect, in producing the Alienation proposed [within the military]; for though many can forgive Injuries, none ever forgave Contempt.
  9.  [Let’s refocus the taxes metaphor onto another issue…] In laying these [or other] Taxes, never regard the heavy Burthens those remote People already undergo [from the state in which they reside], in defending their own Frontiers, supporting their own provincial Governments, making new Roads, building Bridges, Churches and other public Edifices, which in old Countries have been done to your Hands by your Ancestors, but which occasion constant Calls and Demands on the Purses of a new People [such as is the case with Social Security]. Forget the Restraints you lay on their Trade for your own Benefit [for example refusal to approve the Keystone Pipeline], and the Advantage a Monopoly of this Trade gives your exacting Merchants [including, but not limited to, “green” companies]. Think nothing of the Wealth those Merchants and your Manufacturers acquire by the Colony Commerce; their encreased Ability thereby to pay Taxes at home; their accumulating, in the Price of their Commodities, most of those Taxes, and so levying them from their consuming Customers: All this, and the Employment and Support of Thousands of your Poor by the Colonists, you are intirely to forget. But remember to make your arbitrary Tax more grievous to your Provinces, by public Declarations importing that your Power of taxing them has no Limits [or at least will result in a fair redistribution of wealth], so that when you take from them without their Consent a Shilling in the Pound, you have a clear Right to the other nineteen. This will probably weaken every Idea of Security in their Property, and convince them that under such a Government they have nothing they can call their own; which can scarce fail of producing the happiest Consequences! [Ah, how this point might have been written by any number of modern day bloggers…..]
  10. Possibly indeed some of them might still comfort themselves, and say, `Though we have no Property, we have yet something left that is valuable; we have constitutional Liberty both of Person and of Conscience. This King, these Lords, and these Commons, who it seems are too remote from us to know us and feel for us, cannot take from us our Habeas Corpus Right, or our Right of Trial by a Jury of our Neighbours: They cannot deprive us of the Exercise of our Religion [or compel religious based institutions to provide services that are in opposition with their religious beliefs], alter our ecclesiastical Constitutions, and compel us to be Papists if they please, or Mahometans [,or secularists, or atheists].’ To annihilate this Comfort, begin by Laws to perplex their Commerce with infinite Regulations impossible to be remembered and observed [by businesses large and small]; ordain Seizures of their Property for every Failure [such as purchasing mandated healthcare]; take away the Trial of such Property by Jury [by expanding federal forfeiture laws], and give it to arbitrary Judges of your own appointing, and of the lowest Characters in the Country, whose Salaries and Emoluments are to arise out of the Duties or Condemnations, and whose Appointments are during Pleasure. Then let there be a formal Declaration of both Houses [or more likely by the main stream media], that Opposition to your Edicts is Treason, and that Persons suspected of Treason in the Provinces may, according to some obsolete Law [or an executive order such as the National Defense Resources Preparedness Order], be seized and sent to the Metropolis of the Empire for Trial; and pass an Act that those there charged with certain other Offences shall be sent away in Chains from their Friends and Country to be tried in the same Manner for Felony. Then erect a new Court of Inquisition [or more likely a regulatory board] among them, accompanied by an armed Force [or at least a few drones], with Instructions to transport all such suspected Persons, to be ruined by the Expence if they bring over Evidences to prove their Innocence, or be found guilty and hanged if they can’t afford it [let’s hope things don’t get that carried away...]. And lest the People should think you cannot possibly go any farther, pass another solemn declaratory Act, that `King, Lords, and Commons had, hath, and of Right ought to have, full Power and Authority to make Statutes of sufficient Force and Validity to bind the unrepresented Provinces IN ALL CASES WHATSOEVER.’  [Isn’t this what the folks who believe that a declaration of martial law is imminent are afraid of?] This will include spiritual with temporal; and taken together, must operate wonderfully to your Purpose, by convincing them, that they are at present under a Power something like that spoken of in the Scriptures, which can not only kill their Bodies, but damn their Souls to all Eternity, by compelling them, if it pleases, to worship the Devil. [Although some people continue to almost worship the current occupant of the Oval Office, I personally view him as nothing more than a progressive ideologue.]
  11. To make your Taxes more odious, and more likely to procure Resistance, send from the Capital a Board of Officers to superintend the Collection, composed of the most indiscreet, ill-bred and insolent you can find. Let these have large Salaries out of the extorted Revenue, and live in open grating Luxury upon the Sweat and Blood of the Industrious, whom they are to worry continually with groundless and expensive Prosecutions before the above-mentioned arbitrary Revenue-Judges, all at the Cost of the Party prosecuted tho’ acquitted, because the King is to pay no Costs. — Let these Men by your Order be exempted from all the common Taxes and Burthens of the Province, though they and their Property are protected by its Laws. If any Revenue Officers are suspected of the least Tenderness for the People, discard them. If others are justly complained of, protect and reward them. If any of the Under-officers behave so as to provoke the People to drub them, promote those to better Offices: This will encourage others to procure for themselves such profitable Drubbings, by multiplying and enlarging such Provocations, and all with work towards the End you aim at. [While I personally would not characterize the good employees of the Internal Revenue Service in such terms, certain Tea Party groups who feel they are being unfairly scrutinized because of their disagreements with the present administration just might.]
  12. Another Way to make your Tax odious, is to misapply the Produce of it [such as been done in the case of the Social Security trust fund]. If it was originally appropriated for the Defence of the Provinces and the better Support of Government, and the Administration of Justice where it may be necessary, then apply none of it to that Defence, but bestow it where it is not necessary, in augmented Salaries or Pensions [or promises of future appointments] to every Governor who has distinguished himself by his Enmity to the People, and by calumniating them to their Sovereign. This will make them pay it more unwillingly, and be more apt to quarrel with those that collect it, and those that imposed it, who will quarrel again with them, and all shall contribute to your main Purpose of making them weary of your Government.
  13. If the People of any Province have been accustomed to support their own Governors [such as in the case of the Governor of Arizona] and Judges to Satisfaction, you are to apprehend [turn a cold shoulder to] that such Governors and Judges may be thereby influenced to treat the People kindly, and to do them Justice. This is another Reason for applying Part of that Revenue in larger Salaries to such Governors and Judges, given, as their Commissions are, during your Pleasure only, forbidding them to take any Salaries from their Provinces; that thus the People may no longer hope any Kindness from their Governors, or (in Crown Cases) any Justice from their Judges. And as the Money thus mis-applied in one Province is extorted from all [because of crony capitalism], probably all will resent the Mis-application.
  14. If the Parliaments of your Provinces [or critics of your administration] should dare to claim Rights or complain of your Administration, order them to be harass’d with repeated Dissolutions [media investigations, criticisms from your supporters, and the like]. If the same Men are continually return’d by new Elections, adjourn their Meetings to some Country Village where they cannot be accommodated, and there keep them during Pleasure; for this, you know, is your PREROGATIVE; and an excellent one it is, as you may manage it, to promote Discontents among the People, diminish their Respect, and increase their Dis-affection.
  15. [Of course, consider this statement in terms of trade agreements, tariffs, or the proposed LOST treaty rather than any actions of our brave and honorable military personnel] Convert the brave honest Officers of your Navy into pimping Tide-waiters and Colony Officers of the Customs. Let those who in Time of War fought gallantly in Defence of the Commerce of their Countrymen, in Peace be taught to prey upon it. Let them learn to be corrupted by great and real Smugglers, but (to shew their Diligence) scour with armed Boats every Bay, Harbour, River, Creek, Cove or Nook throughout the Coast of your Colonies, stop and detain every Coaster, every Wood-boat, every Fisherman, tumble their Cargoes, and even their Ballast, inside out and upside down; and if a Penn’orth of Pins is found un-entered, let the Whole be seized and confiscated. Thus shall the Trade of your Colonists suffer more from their Friends in Time of Peace, than it did from their Enemies in War. Then let these Boats Crews land upon every Farm in their Way, rob the Orchards, steal the Pigs and Poultry, and insult the Inhabitants. If the injured and exasperated Farmers, unable to procure other Justice, should attack the Agressors, drub them and burn their Boats, you are to call this High Treason and Rebellion, order Fleets and Armies into their Country, and threaten to carry all the Offenders three thousand Miles to be hang’d, drawn and quartered. O! this will work admirably!
  16. If you are told of Discontents in your Colonies [through feedback such as that of the 2010 midterm elections], never believe that they are general, or that you have given Occasion for them; therefore do not think of applying any Remedy, or of changing any offensive Measure. Redress no Grievance [or adopt more moderate positions], lest they should be encouraged to demand the Redress of some other Grievance. Grant no Request that is just and reasonable, lest they should make another that is unreasonable. Take all your Informations of the State of the Colonies from your [same party] Governors [close advisors and contributors] and Officers in Enmity [such as the like-minded ideologues in the Congress] with them. Encourage and reward these Leasing-makers; secrete their lying Accusations lest they should be confuted; but act upon them as the clearest Evidence, and believe nothing you hear from the Friends of the People. Suppose all their Complaints to be invented and promoted by a few factious Demagogues, whom if you could catch and hang, all would be quiet. Catch and hang a few of them accordingly [that would be Dr. Franklin’s suggestions, not mine…]; and the Blood of the Martyrs shall work Miracles in favour of your Purpose.
  17. If you see rival Nations [such as the citizens of Israel] rejoicing at the Prospect of your Disunion with your Provinces [by your defeat in November], and endeavouring to promote it: If they translate, publish and applaud all the Complaints of your discontented Colonists, at the same Time privately stimulating you to severer Measures; let not that alarm or offend you. Why should it? since you all mean the same Thing.
  18. If any Colony should at their own Charge erect a Fortress to secure their Port against the Fleets of a foreign Enemy [or their borders from violations by citizens of another country], get your Governor to betray that Fortress into your Hands [or ask your Attorney General to challenge any laws passed by state citizens or state legislators that challenge federal authority and strive to promote a more secure border]. Never think of paying what it cost the Country, for that would look, at least, like some Regard for Justice; but turn it into a Citadel to awe the Inhabitants and curb their Commerce. If they should have lodged in such Fortress the very Arms they bought and used to aid you in your Conquests, seize them all, ’twill provoke like Ingratitude added to Robbery. One admirable Effect of these Operations will be, to discourage every other Colony from erecting such Defences, and so their and your Enemies may more easily invade them, to the great Disgrace of your Government, and of course the Furtherance of your Project.
  19. Send Armies [or the ATF] into their Country under Pretence of protecting the Inhabitants; but instead of garrisoning the Forts on their Frontiers with those Troops, to prevent Incursions, demolish those Forts [and sell guns to Mexican drug cartels], and order the Troops into the Heart of the Country, that the Savages [drug lords] may be encouraged to attack the Frontiers, and that the Troops may be protected by the Inhabitants [such as the militia groups who sought to assist federal officials by providing surveillance of the Mexican border]: This will seem to proceed from your Ill will or your Ignorance, and contribute farther to produce and strengthen an Opinion among them, that you are no longer fit to govern them.
  20. Lastly, Invest the General of your Army in the Provinces with great and unconstitutional Powers, and free him from the Controul of even your own Civil Governors. Let him have Troops enow under his Command, with all the Fortresses in his Possession; and who knows but (like some provincial Generals in the Roman Empire, and encouraged by the universal Discontent you have produced) he may take it into his Head to set up for himself. If he should, and you have carefully practised these few excellent Rules of mine, take my Word for it, all the Provinces will immediately join him, and you will that Day (if you have not done it sooner) get rid of the Trouble of governing them, and all the Plagues attending their Commerce and Connection from thenceforth and for ever. Q. E. D.”

[Although there is no general with unconstitutional powers roaming freely around this great nation, there is a well organized group of citizens who desire reforms that would return the federal government to the size and scope which is outlined in the Constitution. When they decided to  collectively use their votes to send a clear message, then I believe Dr. Franklin’s Q.E.D (the Latin phrase "quod erat demonstrandum” that translates into the chain of the argument "which was to be demonstrated" or proven) will have once again have been correctly concluded. Bravo, Dr. Franklin! Your words which are still wise more than 200 years after they were written.]

Read Benjamin Franklin’s will at: http://www.bingoforpatriots.com/american-history/founding-fathers/signers-of-the-declaration-of-independence/benjamin-franklin/benjamin-franklins-documents/benjamin-franklins-last-will-and-testament/

Read Benjamin Franklin’s voluminous correspondence and other papers at: http://www.franklinpapers.org/franklin/  

Please take a moment to member the wise words of our Founders and What IS Right With America!

Susan

Susan C. Rempel, Ph.D.